|2.5 tons: What a family eats in a year ~1970's|
Thursday, September 4, 2014
High crop yields often come under scrutiny because of the need for fertilizers and the perception of their potential environmental impacts. Newspaper articles, letters, and advertisements from well-intended, but poorly informed, citizens seem to perpetuate old myths and clichés about modern fertilization practices.
The fact is, maintaining food production for the growing world population requires the use of new technology and the intensification of management to grow more food on the existing cropland...and fertilizer is essential for accomplishing this.
Sometimes I get tired of hearing about the negative fertilizer issues that are associated with our abundant, affordable, and nutritious food supply...a truly amazing supply of healthy food that is clearly unprecedented in the history of the world!
Misapplication and misuse of agricultural fertilizers have undoubtedly occurred and their impact on the environment needs to be minimized. But to fairly judge the use of fertilizers, the risks of their use should be compared with their benefits for food production.
I have had people tell me that raising yields with commercial fertilizer is somehow immoral and dangerous for our soils... that strictly organic or specialty products will meet the demand of global food production. You probably know about the “stink test”... that is, when something smells fishy there is usually a reason why! Many of these ideas and claims just don’t pass stink the test.
The time has come for all of us dispel myths about fertilizers and nutrients, and to convey a correct message to a world which is becoming increasingly urbanized and removed from what agricultural production is all about... providing healthy food.
How Does Fertilizer Contribute to the
A survey of U.S. crop production estimated that average corn yields would decline by 40% without N fertilizer. Even greater declines would occur if regular additions of P and K were also halted. Numerous long-term studies have also demonstrated the contributions of fertilizer to sustaining crop yields. For example, long-term studies in Oklahoma show a 40% wheat yield decline would occur without regular N and P additions. A long-term study in Missouri found that 57% of the grain yield was attributable to fertilizer and lime additions. Similarly, long-term trials from Kansas show that 60% of the corn yield was attributable to fertilizer N and P.
Few people appreciate that corn yields have continued to increase in the Corn Belt of the U.S. without a similar increase in N fertilization. In fact, N use efficiency has increased at least 35% in the past 25 years (where less N fertilizer is now required to produce a bushel of grain). Remarkably, more corn is being harvested without increasing N fertilizer application rates. Some of this improvement has also come from modern genetics and improved agronomic management.
Saturday, August 23, 2014
ALMOST ALL PLANT PROCESSES require phosphorus (P) to operate. Phosphorus is essential for life sustaining reactions including energy transfer, activation of proteins, and regulation of metabolic processes. While the primary source of P for plants is inorganic phosphate, there are very few soils that naturally contain a sufficient P supply to allow unrestricted plant growth.
This article originally appeared as a newsletter of the International Plant Nutrition Institute. The pdf is available here.
Compared with the other major nutrients, P is the least mobile and available to plants in most soil conditions and therefore it is commonly a major limiting factor for plant growth. Even in well-fertilized soils, the P concentration rarely exceeds a few hundred parts per billion (ppb) and is commonly less than 50 ppb in the soil solution.
Up to half of the soil P is commonly found in organic forms, derived from materials such as plant residues and soil organisms. However, organic P must be mineralized to inorganic phosphate (the form found in most fertilizers) before it can be taken up and used by plants for growth.
Because of its strong reactions with soil components, P is principally supplied to plant roots by diffusion rather than mass flow. Phosphorus uptake occurs primarily at the young root tip, into the epidermal cells with root hairs, and into cells in the outer layer of the root cortex.
|The P depletion zone in soil|
The young root tips, continually expanding into fresh soil, are exposed to P concentrations found in the bulk soil solution (Figure 1). While P is rapidly taken up along the root surface, a P depletion zone of 0.2 to 1.0 mm (about the thickness of a dime) develops surrounding the root. Root hairs help expand the surface area available for P absorption. Mycorrhizal fungi, growing in association with root cells and extending up to several centimeters into the soil, can also transfer P to the root. Various crops have been shown to have different abilities to extract P from the soil and to make these beneficial associations with mycorrhizal fungi that extend their effective root system.
Rhizosphere is the soil zone (within 2 mm of the root) that is influenced by heightened biological activity, nutrient uptake, and chemical changes that result from root activity.
Getting P into the Plant: Apoplastic and Symplastic Transport
The apoplasm comprises the root walls, the cortical cells and the open spaces between these tissues (Figure 2 ). This “dead space” consists of interlaced fibers that form an open latticework in roots that serves to filter the soil solution. The soil solution moves through these spaces and pores until it reaches the tough “Casparian strip” that surrounds the core (stele) of the root. A net negative charge associated with the cell wall fibers repels anions...such as phosphate and nitrate (NO3 - ) in solution and confines their transport to larger pores within the apoplasm. Movement of nutrients through the apoplasm into the root is greatest near the root tip. Mucilage, a complex mixture of organic materials excreted around the root, also carries negatively charged hydroxyl groups which can further repel the movement of anions towards the root.
The symplast , by contrast, is a living system within the plant that connects each growing organ. It consists of thin walled cells called parenchyma, which have small openings acting as “tunnels” where the content of one cell connects with the contents (protoplasm) of the adjacent cell. The symplast is very fragile and requires the rigid framework of the apoplast to hold it in place.
Although the soil solution P concentration may be less than 50 ppb, the concentration in plant cells is much higher…50 to 500 parts per million (ppm). For plants to boost their P concentration by over a thousand times, active transport (requiring energy) across the root membranes (the plasmalemma) is required.
The movement of P from the apoplast across root cell membranes is the critical step in the transport of nutrients into the plant, requiring an energy-driven transport mechanism to move P through the membranes into the plant root cells (phosphate transporters). Researchers are currently working on ways to increase the uptake of P by stimulating these nutrient transport proteins found in the root.
Other changes take place in the rhizosphere to improve P uptake and recovery. Many roots exude organic acids (primarily citrate and oxalate) into the rhizosphere, which enhance P availability. While this response has been frequently measured, the major effect may be due to the organic compounds displacing P held by the soil (ligand exchange), rather than a direct effect of the organic acids on the rhizosphere pH. Some microorganisms living in the rhizosphere have been shown to help solubilize soil P.
These mechanisms can help improve P recovery, but they all require that P be present in the soil to begin with. No amount of excreted organic acid, root-zone microorganisms, or mycorrhizal fungi can allow a plant to recover P from a soil that does not contain P to begin with.
Plant roots can also have a considerable effect on rhizosphere pH. This pH change comes from the release of H+ or OH- (as HCO3 - ) as plants balance their uptake of excess cations or anions. Nitrogen nutrition plays the most important part in this ion balance since it is the mineral taken up in the largest quantity by most plants and it can occur as either an anion (NO3 - ) or a cation (NH4 + ). Research suggests that greater P uptake that occurs as plants are fertilized with a source of NH4+ may be the result of rhizosphere acidification that occurs with this N source. However, depending on the buffering capacity of the soil, only little change in pH may be observed in some soils.
There are many complex reactions occurring under our feet as roots invisibly work to meet the nutritional needs of the growing plants. Research is underway in many areas to improve the efficiency of P fertilizer use. Advances in improving root function may someday lead to better ways of meeting the nutrient demands of crops. For now, the focus remains on maintaining adequate soil fertility by using regular plant and soil testing, proper fertilization techniques, and appropriate management to keep the nutrients where they are needed for the growing plant.
This article originally appeared as a newsletter of the International Plant Nutrition Institute. The pdf is available here.
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
Kieserite is a naturally occurring mineral that is chemically known as magnesium sulfate monohydrate (MgSO4·H2O). It is mined from geologic marine deposits and provides a soluble source of both Mg and S for plant nutrition.
|Magnesium deficient grapes|
Kieserite is primarily obtained from deep underground deposits of minerals in Germany. It is present in the remnants of ancient oceans that were evaporated and are now buried beneath the earth’s surface.
These mineral resources contain a variety of
valuable plant nutrients. The ore is brought to the surface where the magnesium
salts are separated from potassium and sodium salts using a unique, dry
electrostatic (ESTA) process.
|Mining in Germany|
The fine crystalline kieserite is sold for direct application to soil, or it is granulated to a larger particle size that is better suited for mechanical fertilizer spreading or for bulk blending with other fertilizers.
Chemical formula: MgSO4·H2O
Mg content: 16% (kieserite fine); 15% (kieserite granular)
S content: 22% (kieserite fine); 20% (kieserite granular)
Solubility: 417 g/L (20°C)
Solution pH: 9
Kieserite provides a highly concentrated form of two essential plant nutrients—Mg and S. Since kieserite applications have no major effect on soil pH, it can be supplied to all kinds of soil, irrespective of soil pH. It is commonly used prior to or during the growing season to meet the nutrient requirement of crops. Due to its high solubility it can be used to supply both Mg and S during peak periods of crop demand. Since kieserite is an earth mineral mined from naturally occurring deposits, it is permitted as an organic nutrient source by some organic certifying agencies.
Kieserite itself is not used as foliar fertilizer or in fertigation systems, but it serves as raw material for the production of Epsom salt (MgSO4·7 H2O), which is totally soluble and suitable for both fertigation and foliar application.
Many soils are low in Mg and require supplemental nutrients to support crop yield and quality. Sandy-textured soils and soils with a low pH (such as highly weathered tropical soils) are frequently characterized by a low Mg supply for plants. Under these conditions, it is a prerequisite to raise the Mg content in the soil by adequate fertilization.
Splitting Mg applications into two or more doses is recommended in areas with high precipitation in order to avoid leaching losses. Soils in temperate climates with higher clay content may have higher Mg contents and are often less prone to leaching losses.
Fertilizer Mg application rates vary depending on factors such as the specific crop requirement, the quantity removed during harvest, and the ability of soil minerals to release adequate Mg in a timely manner to support crop yield and quality. Kieserite application rates are typically in the range of 200 to 300 kg/ha for many crops. Additional Mg and S demands during peak growth periods demand can be met by foliar application of materials such as Epsom salt or a variety of soluble nutrient sources.
|Magnesium deficient soybeans|
Thursday, June 12, 2014
Plant nutrient deficiency symptoms begin to appear when one of the essential nutrients is lacking.
Sometimes deficiencies appear early in the growing season when soils are cold or wet, and when root activity is low. Deficiencies are also commonly observed later in the season when the soil cannot satisfy the high nutrient demand of a rapidly growing crop. Whether the deficiency is caused by poor root uptake or low nutrient-supplying power of the soil, proper management practices can help alleviate these problems.
Deficient plants do not initially show any obvious symptoms of nutrient shortage other than slower growth, which can also be due to many factors. In the case of a mild deficiency, plants may never show a visual symptom except slow growth and reduced yield.
Nutrient deficiency causes a disruption in any number of essential metabolic processes within the plant. Crops mature unevenly because deficiencies rarely occur uniformly across entire fields. This leads to lower yield, harvesting difficulties and poorer crop quality. And as previously stated, this can all occur without diagnostic symptoms appearing.
When deficiency symptoms become noticeable, severe stress is already occurring and steps should be considered to overcome the problem, if it is practical and economical to do. The effects of other stresses such as drought and pests can complicate diagnoses. Another problem is that not all deficiencies produce clear-cut symptoms. Then there is the possibility of multiple deficiencies. The most severe deficiency may be manifested first. Knowing which nutrients are mobile or immobile within the plant is helpful in pinpointing the cause of the deficiency symptom. Diagnosing symptoms also requires understanding of specific crop colors and markers. It is worth noting that some crops are more susceptible to visible symptoms than others.
Plant analysis (tissue testing) is useful for diagnosing specific nutrient deficiencies as they arise. It is best when nutrient concentrations in deficient plants growing in problem areas are compared with healthy plants to identify the differences. It is also helpful to collect soil samples for analysis from the two areas at the time the plant samples are collected.
Tissue testing also is valuable for monitoring plant health during the season to verify that nutrient concentrations do not drop below nor exceed established critical values. Guidelines have been developed for many crops for what the appropriate nutrient concentrations should be during various growth stages. Supplemental fertilization should be considered if the concentrations fall below these established thresholds.
Pre-season soil testing should also be part of a strategy for preventing nutrient shortages. In addition to helping avoid plant stress, soil analysis will allow decisions to be made that will avoid over or under application of fertilizer and resulting economic inefficiency.
The International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) has a large database of nutrient deficiency images that is continually growing. Visit the website at: http://media.ipni.net. Additionally, a collection of over 500 of our best plant nutrient deficiency photos is available for purchase at http://ipni.info/nutrientimagecollection. A condensed version of this collection is available as an app for iPhones and iPads at http://www.ipni.net/article/IPNI-3273. When nutrient deficiency symptoms appear, first act quickly to diagnose the problem and then make plans to correct it and to avoid having them reoccur in the future.
This blog posting originally appeared as part of the Plant Nutrition Institute quarterly newsletters "Plant Nutrition Today". The entire series can be viewed here.
Tuesday, June 3, 2014
An interesting project is currently underway in Lake Winnipeg.
The Manitoba government is trying to stop the
growth of the aggressive zebra mussel.
Zebra mussels, native to Eastern Europe and Western Asia, are extremely
invasive and latch onto boats, buoys, rocks, and other structures.
|Lake Winnipeg in Manitoba, Canada|
Zebra mussels are very difficult to control and previous attempts to halt their spread in the U.S. and Canada have largely been ineffective. However mussels are sensitive to high potassium concentrations and it is hoped that this may be the key to slowing down their invasion.
A concentrated potassium chloride solution was recently added to the Winnipeg Beach Harbor and all of the zebra mussels were killed within ten days. Potassium chloride does not have a negative impact on fish, other mussels, humans, or water quality as it gradually dissipates into the lake.
|Zebra mussels (Wikipedia)|
You will recall that Canada has the largest geologic reserves of potassium chloride in the world. These mines harvest naturally occurring potassium minerals from the ground, wash away any impurities, and then sell valuable potassium fertilizer (potash) to agricultural regions around the world where soil reserves of potassium are too low to support healthy plant growth.
|Potash mine in Saskatchewan, Canada|
You can read more about this in these news outlets:
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
The 4R principles of nutrient stewardship involve selecting the “Right Source” of nutrients to meet plant demands. This fundamental decision of nutrient source influences the process of choosing the Right Place, Right Time, and Right Rate for each field.
A misconception persists that using manufactured fertilizers means opposing the use of organic nutrient sources. Most agronomists agree that selecting the right source of nutrients begins with first considering the supply of on-farm nutrients and then supplementing them with commercial fertilizers.
Integrated Plant Nutrient Management is the term used by agronomists to describe the appropriate use of both fertilizer and organic sources of nutrients. Every farming operation will differ in its access to various nutrient sources and there is a range in specific crop requirements, but all farmers have the goal of maximum crop output and harvest quality from the right nutrient application.
Organic nutrient sources can include soil organic matter, a small portion of which decomposes and releases nutrients each year. Crop residues vary greatly in nutrient content, but can be a contributing nutrient source in many situations. Animal manures are commonly used as a valuable source of plant nutrients. Manures and composts can have a wide range in nutrient
composition, so it is useful to have them
chemically analyzed to assess their fertilizer-replacement value. Cover crops
can also be a useful nutrient source. Legume cover crops have the benefit of
providing extra nutrients by hosting N-fixing bacteria. Grass cover crops can
capture and retain nutrients that might have otherwise leached past the root
zone, then release their nutrients again as they decompose.
|Compost can be a useful nutrient source|
Many excellent commercial fertilizers can be used to deliver nutrients that are lacking for successful crop production. Commercial fertilizers are most commonly used as bulk blends of popular granular fertilizers; compound fertilizers, which are a mixture of multiple nutrients within a single fertilizer particle; fluid fertilizers, homogeneous clear liquids which can be blended with materials such as micronutrients, herbicides, and pesticides, or diluted for foliar application; and suspension fertilizers which use a suspending clay or gelling agent to keep small fertilizer particles from settling out of the liquid.
Additional considerations in selecting the Right Nutrient Source might include:
• The soil chemical and physical properties (such as avoiding nitrate application in flooded soil, or surface application of urea on high pH soils).
|Preparing soil for rice|
• Availability of fertilizer application equipment to get the nutrients delivered properly.
• Blends of multiple fertilizer materials must account for their chemical properties and compatibilities.
• Recognize sensitivities and secondary benefits of specific fertilizer materials (such as chloride additions that may be beneficial for small grains, but possibly detrimental for the yield and quality of other crops in excessive concentrations).
Selecting the Right Source of nutrients is too often overlooked due to tradition and the ease of doing the same thing every year. Remember that crop production is very complex and that successful farmers need to be both
artists and scientists with an understanding of all the 4R’s to meet their goals.
This post originally appeared as part of a series of quarterly newsletters (Plant Nutrition Today) published by the International Plant Nutrition Institute.
Wednesday, May 7, 2014
Potassium fertilizer is commonly added to improve the yield and quality of plants growing in soils that are lacking an adequate supply of this essential nutrient. Most fertilizer K comes from ancient salt deposits located throughout the world. The word “potash” is a general term that most frequently refers to potassium chloride (KCl), but it also applies to all other K-containing fertilizers, such as potassium sulfate (K2SO4, commonly referred to as sulfate of potash or SOP).
|Potassium sulfate, Great Salt Lake, Utah|
In New Mexico (USA), K2SO4 is separated from langbeinite minerals by reacting it with a solution of KCl, which removes the byproducts (such as Mg) and leaves K2SO4. Similar processing techniques are used in many parts of the world, depending on the raw materials accessible.
Chemical Formula: K2SO4
K content: 40 to 44% (48 to 53% K2O)
S content: 17 to 18%
Solubility (25 ºC) 120 g/L
Solution pH approx. 7
Concentrations of K in soil are often too low to support healthy plant growth. Potassium is needed to complete many essential functions in plants, such as activating enzyme reactions, synthesizing proteins, forming starch and sugars, and regulating water flow in cells and leaves.
Potassium sulfate is an excellent source of nutrition for plants. The K portion of the K2SO4 is no different than other common potash fertilizers. However, it also supplies a valuable source of S, which is sometimes deficient for plant growth. Sulfur is required for protein synthesis and enzyme function. There are certain soils and crops where the addition of Cl- should be avoided. In these cases, K2SO4 makes a very suitable K source. Potassium sulfate is only one-third as soluble as KCl, so it is not as commonly dissolved for addition through irrigation water unless there is a need for additional S.
Several particle sizes are commonly available. Fine particles (<0.015 mm) are used for making solutions for irrigation or foliar sprays since it is more rapid to dissolve. Foliar sprays of K2SO4 are a convenient way to apply additional K and S to plants, supplementing the nutrients taken up from the soil. Leaf damage can occur if the concentration is too high.
K2SO4 is frequently used for crops where additional Cl- from more common KCl fertilizer is undesirable. The partial salt index of K2SO4 is lower than some other common K fertilizers, so less total salinity is added per unit of K. The salt measurement (EC) from a K2SO4 solution is less than a third of a similar concentration of a KCl solution (10 mmol/L). Where high rates of K2SO4 are needed, it is generally recommended to divide the application into multiple doses. This helps avoid surplus K accumulation by the plant and also minimizes any potential salt damage.
A pdf version of this information is available
at the IPNI website here
A pdf version of this information is available
at the IPNI website here